World
history, global
history or transnational history (not to be confused with diplomatic
or international history) is a field of historical study that emerged as a distinct
academic field in the 1980s. It examines history from a global perspective. It
is not to be confused with comparative
history, which,
like world history, deals with the history of multiple cultures and nations,
but does not do so on a global scale.
World
History looks for common patterns that emerge across all
cultures. World historians use a thematic approach, with two major focal
points: integration (how processes of world history
have drawn people of the world together) and difference (how patterns of world history reveal the
diversity of the human experience).
Establishment
of the field : The
advent of world history as a distinct academic field of study can be traced to
1980s, and was heralded by the creation of the World History Association and
graduate programs at a handful of universities. Over the next decades scholarly
publications, professional and academic organizations, and graduate programs in
world history proliferated. World History has often displaced Western
Civilization in the required curriculum of American high schools and universities,
and is supported by new textbooks with a world history approach.
Organizations
:
- The H-World discussion list serves as a network of communication among practitioners of world history, with discussions among scholars, announcements, syllabi, bibliographies and book reviews.
- The International Society for the Comparative Study of Civilizations (ISCSC) approaches world history from the standpoint of comparative civilizations. Founded at a conference in 1961 in Salzburg, Austria, that was attended by Othmar Anderlie, Pitirim Sorokin, and Arnold J. Toynbee, this is an international association of scholars that publishes a journal, Comparative Civilization Review, and hosts an annual meeting in cities around the world.
- The Journal of World History has been published quarterly by the World History Association since 1990.
- World History Association (WHA) - Established in the 1980s, the WHA is predominantly an American phenomenon.
Pre-modern
Histoy : The
study of world history, as distinct from national history, has existed in many
world cultures. However, early forms of world history were not truly global,
and were limited to only the regions known by historian.
In
Ancient
China, Chinese
world history, that of China and the surrounding people of East Asia, was based on the dynastic cycle articulated by Sima Qian in circa 100 BC. Sima Qian's
model is based on the Mandate of Heaven. Rulers rise when they united
China, then are overthrown when a ruling dynasty became corrupt. Each new
dynasty begins virtuous and strong, but then decays, provoking the transfer of
Heaven's mandate to a new ruler. The test of virtue in a new dynasty is success
in being obeyed by China and neighboring barbarians. After 2000 years Sima
Qian's model still dominates scholarship, although the dynastic cycle is no longer used for modern
Chinese history.
In
Ancient
Greece, Herodotus (5th century BC), as founder of
Greek historiography. Presents insightful and lively discussions of the
customs, geography, and history of Mediterranean peoples, particularly the
Egyptians. However, his great rival Thucydides promptly discarded Herodotus's
all-embracing approach to history, offering instead a more precise, sharply
focused monograph, dealing not with vast empires over the centuries but with 27
years of war between Athens and Sparta. In Rome, the vast, patriotic history of
Rome by Livy (59 BC-17 AD) approximated Herodotean inclusiveness; Polybius
(c.200-c.118 BC) aspired to combine the logical rigor of Thucydides with the
scope of Herodotus.
In Central Asia, The
Secret History of Mongols
is regarded as the single significant native Mongolian account of Genghis Khan.
The Secret History is regarded as a piece of classic literature in both
Mongolia and the rest of the world.
In
the Middle East, Ala'iddin
Ata-Malik Juvayni
(1226–1283) was a Persian historian who wrote an account of the Mongol Empire
entitled Ta' rīkh-i
jahān-gushā (History of the World Conqueror). The standard edition of Juvayni
is published under the title Ta' rīkh-i
jahān-gushā, ed. Mirza Muhammad Qazwini, 3 vol, Gibb
Memorial Series 16 (Leiden and London, 1912–37). An English translation by John
Andrew Boyle "The History of the World-Conqueror" was republished in
1997.
Rashīd al-Dīn
Fadhl-allāh
Hamadānī (1247–1318), was a Persian physician of Jewish
origin, polymathic writer and historian, who wrote an enormous Islamic history,
the Jami al-Tawarikh, in the Persian language, often considered a landmark in
intercultural historiography and a key document on the Ilkhanids (13th and 14th
century). His encyclopedic knowledge of a wide range of cultures from Mongolia
to China to the Steppes of Central Eurasia to Persia, the Arab lands, and
Europe, provide the most direct access to information on the late Mongol era.
His descriptions also highlight the manner in which the Mongol Empire and its
emphasis on trade resulted in an atmosphere of cultural and religious exchange
and intellectual ferment, resulting in the transmission of a host of ideas from
East to West and vice versa.
One
Arab scholar, Ibn
Khaldun
(1332-1409) broke with traditionalism and offered a model of historical change
in Muqaddimah, an exposition of the methodology of scientific history.
Ibn Khaldun focused on the reasons for the rise and fall of civilization,
arguing that the causes of change are to be sought in the economic and social
structure of society. His work was largely ignored in the Muslim world.[12] Otherwise the Muslim, Chinese
and Indian intellectuals held fast to a religious traditionalism, leaving them
unprepared to advise national leaders on how to confront the European intrusion
into Asia after 1500.
Early
modern : During
the Renaissance in Europe, history was written
about states or nations. The study of history changed during the Enlightenment and Romanticism. Voltaire described the history of
certain ages that he considered important, rather than describing events in
chronological order. History became an independent discipline. It was not
called philosophia historiae anymore, but merely history (historia).
Giambattista Vico (1668–1744) in Italy wrote Scienza
nuova seconda (The New Science) in 1725, which argued history as the
expression of human will and deeds. He thought that men are historical entities
and that human nature changes over time. Each epoch should be seen as a whole
in which all aspects of culture—art, religion, philosophy, politics, and
economics—are interrelated (a point developed later by Oswald Spengler). Vico showed that myth,
poetry, and art are entry points to discovering the true spirit of a culture.
Vico outlined a conception of historical development in which great cultures,
like Rome, undergo cycles of growth and decline. His ideas were out of fashion
during the Enlightenment, but influenced the Romantic
historians after 1800.
A
major theoretical foundation for world history was given by German philosopher G. W. F. Hegel, who saw the modern Prussian
state as the highest stage of world development.
Contemporary
: World history
became a popular genre in the 20th century with universal history.
In
the 1920s several best-sellers dealt with the history of the world, including
surveys The
Story of Mankind
(1921) by Hendrik
Willem van Loon
and The
Outline of History
(1918) by H.G.
Wells.
Influential
writers who have reached wide audiences include H. G. Wells, Oswald Spengler, Arnold J. Toynbee, Pitirim Sorokin, Christopher
Dawson,[13] and Lewis Mumford. Scholars working the field
include Eric
Voegelin,[14] William
H. McNeill and Michael
Mann.
Spengler's Decline of the West (2
vol 1919–1922) compared nine organic cultures: Egyptian (3400 BC-1200 BC),
Indian (1500 BC-1100 BC), Chinese (1300 BC-AD 200), Classical (1100 BC-400 BC),
Byzantine (AD 300–1100), Aztec (AD 1300–1500), Arabian (AD 300–1250), Mayan (AD
600–960), and Western (AD 900–1900). His book was a smashing success among
intellectuals worldwide as it predicted the disintegration of European and
American civilization after a violent "age of Caesarism," arguing by
detailed analogies with other civilizations. It deepened the post-World War I
pessimism in Europe, and was warmly received by intellectuals in China, India
and Latin America who hoped his predictions of the collapse of European empires
would soon come true.
In
1936–1954, Toynbee's ten-volume A Study of
History came out in three separate installments. He followed Spengler in
taking a comparative topical approach to independent civilizations. Toynbee
said they displayed striking parallels in their origin, growth, and decay.
Toynbee rejected Spengler's biological model of civilizations as organisms with
a typical life span of 1,000 years. Like Sima Qian, Toynbee explained decline as
due to their moral failure. Many readers rejoiced in his implication (in vols.
1–6) that only a return to some form of Catholicism could halt the breakdown of
western civilization which began with the Reformation. Volumes 7–10, published
in 1954, abandoned the religious message, and his popular audience slipped
away, while scholars gleefully picked apart his mistakes.
McNeill wrote The Rise of the West
(1965) to improve upon Toynbee by showing how the separate civilizations of
Eurasia interacted from the very beginning of their history, borrowing critical
skills from one another, and thus precipitating still further change as
adjustment between traditional old and borrowed new knowledge and practice
became necessary. McNeill took a broad approach organized around the
interactions of peoples across the globe. Such interactions have become both
more numerous and more continual and substantial in recent times. Before about
1500, the network of communication between cultures was that of Eurasia. The
term for these areas of interaction differ from one world historian to another
and include world-system and ecumene. Whatever it is called, the
importance of these intercultural contacts has begun to be recognized by many
scholars.[18]
History
education
United
States :In
college curricula of the United States, world history became a popular
replacement for courses on Western
Civilization,
beginning in the 1970s. Professors Patrick
Manning,
previously of Northeastern University and now at the University of Pittsburgh's
World History Center; and Ross E. Dunn at San Diego State are leaders
in promoting innovative teaching methods.[19]
Recent
themes : In
recent years, the relationship between African and world history has shifted
rapidly from one of antipathy to one of engagement and synthesis. Reynolds
(2007) surveys the relationship between African and world histories, with an
emphasis on the tension between the area studies paradigm and the growing
world-history emphasis on connections and exchange across regional boundaries.
A closer examination of recent exchanges and debates over the merits of this
exchange is also featured. Reynolds sees the relationship between African and
world history as a measure of the changing nature of historical inquiry over
the past century. Histories have traditionally been written from the
perspective of national governments or of geographically based communities.
However, it is also possible to see world history as the story of a single
human civilization developing new institutions and forms of expression over
successive periods of time. World history can thus be a “creation story” to
tell how the world of human society developed. In this mode, the story would
include not only political and diplomatic history but also events relating to
religion, commerce, education, and entertainment. Technologies of communication
would have an important role in this history.
No comments:
Post a Comment